Finally!!
One has to wonder what kind of society we live in when, not only are people left homeless, we don't even want a homeless person covering their head while they sleep in a PUBLICLY OWNED space. That's how it has been in Victoria, City of Gardens, until yesterday.
A B.C. Supreme Court judge has struck down the City of Victoria's bylaws that prevent homeless people from sleeping in city parks.
In a judgment released today, Justice Carol Ross found it is unconstitutional to prevent homeless people from sleeping on public property or erecting shelter to protect themselves when there are not enough shelter beds available for the number who are homeless.
“We're very, very pleased,” said Catherine Boies Parker, one of the lawyers representing the people challenging the bylaws. “It's a huge step towards recognizing the importance of the safety and the dignity of homeless people.”
Victoria mayor Alan Lowe the local Times colonist reports, will release a statement later in the day.
“I'm sleeping in a tent-city tonight,” wrote David Arthur Johnston, one of the defendants challenging the bylaws, in an e-mail. Supporters were to meet at the Victoria court house at noon.
So now we wait and see. Will this scenario run like that of the courts ruling on Insite where the Conservative government is appealing the ruling that it is unconstitutional to not provide safe consuption space? Will the city decide they just don't want to support struggling people in the most simplest of ways?
On my blog, I can say what I want. Why, why does the ruling class hate helping those that struggle in our society?
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Monday, June 02, 2008
Old News...New Research
Recently, the Centre for Addictions Research of BC released some fresh new research on alcohol and other drug use in BC. The research is a result of the compilation of a pilot project – BC Alcohol and Other Drug Monitoring Project. It’s not so much the distinctiveness of the information or that it is so noteworthy as much as it is so unremarkable that makes it remarkable. Speak with anyone that works in the addictions field and see that the stats are old news.
For example, people in the field have known for some time that the so-called “Crystal Meth epidemic” is only another form of fear-mongering. Those interested in furthering the failed war on drugs love to make the use of any substance sound worse than it really is. Substances with as or more devastating effects on health are more commonly used in British Columbia than crystal meth. These include alcohol, cocaine, ecstasy and nicotine. In fact, higher percentages of people surveyed tried alcohol, marijuana, cocaine and ecstasy than those that tried crystal meth. Crystal meth was tried by more people than only heroin. The same goes for those with some form of dependence on the substance. Only, at that measure, crystal meth had the least proportion of people dependent than any other substance. Not what you would call epidemic proportions.
Another consideration: crystal meth is the drug of choice for young people. Again, the facts don’t mesh with with the popular mythology. It is very frightening to think that your 15 year old daughter is likely to try and become addicted to this substance. But is it really that scary to think that a 40 year old homeless guy is likely to use crystal meth? The fact is, that is who is most likely to use this drug.
Don’t get me wrong. There is no doubt that crystal meth and other illicit drugs are harmful in a variety of ways. I take issue with how they are portrayed and, by extension, how we as a society deal with the problem.
Stay tuned for my next post. I’ll talk about how we deal with the problem and the recent BC Supreme Court ruling that the Insight clinic in Vancouver is protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights.
For example, people in the field have known for some time that the so-called “Crystal Meth epidemic” is only another form of fear-mongering. Those interested in furthering the failed war on drugs love to make the use of any substance sound worse than it really is. Substances with as or more devastating effects on health are more commonly used in British Columbia than crystal meth. These include alcohol, cocaine, ecstasy and nicotine. In fact, higher percentages of people surveyed tried alcohol, marijuana, cocaine and ecstasy than those that tried crystal meth. Crystal meth was tried by more people than only heroin. The same goes for those with some form of dependence on the substance. Only, at that measure, crystal meth had the least proportion of people dependent than any other substance. Not what you would call epidemic proportions.
Another consideration: crystal meth is the drug of choice for young people. Again, the facts don’t mesh with with the popular mythology. It is very frightening to think that your 15 year old daughter is likely to try and become addicted to this substance. But is it really that scary to think that a 40 year old homeless guy is likely to use crystal meth? The fact is, that is who is most likely to use this drug.
Don’t get me wrong. There is no doubt that crystal meth and other illicit drugs are harmful in a variety of ways. I take issue with how they are portrayed and, by extension, how we as a society deal with the problem.
Stay tuned for my next post. I’ll talk about how we deal with the problem and the recent BC Supreme Court ruling that the Insight clinic in Vancouver is protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)